GCP penetration testingthat proves what scans missed.
Manual GCP penetration testing for Google Cloud Platform. We hunt named bug classes: Workload Identity Federation confusion, service account impersonation, Cloud Run trigger replay, GKE node pool escape, VPC Service Controls bypass.
CREST-accredited testers · CERT-In empanelled · 14 years of offensive research
GCP surfaces
VPC · IAM · GKE · Workload Identity Federation. One pod, one method, four control planes.
Working proof
Every finding ships with a working exploit transcript, code-level fix guidance, and a free re-test.
Compliance-ready
PCI DSS, HIPAA, ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2 Type II. Your auditor reads the same artefact.
The window from vulnerability discovery to exploitation has gone from weeks to hours.
Trusted by security teams across Fintech, SaaS & Education, Enterprise & Telecom, Security & Critical Infrastructure
On record
What we test
Four GCP surfaces. One method.
Each surface scoped against named bug classes. We chain across them. A Workload Identity token misuse can land in BigQuery, exfiltrating data tagged for VPC Service Controls.
VPC + perimeter
VPC Service Controls bypass, firewall egress oversight, Identity-Aware Proxy misconfig, Cloud NAT exposure. Lateral movement chained inside the perimeter.
IAM + identity
Service account impersonation via iam.serviceAccounts.actAs, allow-policy plus deny-policy interaction gaps, Organization policy drift, custom-role privilege creep.
GKE + workloads
Node pool escape via privileged pod, GKE Autopilot constraint bypass, Workload Identity binding abuse, metadata API exposure inside the pod.
Storage + secrets
Cloud Storage bucket IAM, signed-URL leakage, Secret Manager accessor scope, Cloud KMS key policy bypass, Firestore unauth read.
Why a Security Command Center scan isn't a pentest
A flag passed is not a finding proven.
Security Command Center, Forseti, and Cloud Asset Inventory report what your GCP project looks like. A GCP penetration testing engagement reports what an attacker can do with it. SecureLayer7 operators chain those flagged findings into the proof-of-exploit your dev team can fix and your auditor will accept.
IN SCOPE.
Where we look across your GCP estate.
Workload Identity, impersonation paths, Org-level IAM, Cloud Identity federation.
Metadata server access, node-pool escape, Cloud Run service-account scope, Cloud Build trust.
Bucket IAM, dataset sharing, authorized views, KMS key rings, snapshot lineage.
Shared VPC, VPC Service Controls, Private Service Connect, peering gaps across projects.
GCP PENTEST METHODOLOGY.
Eight phases. One artifact.
Each GCP penetration testing engagement moves through eight phases and lands on one named artefact: a CREST-mapped severity rubric scored against your project invariants.
- 01Threat-model & scope
- 02Reconnaissance
- 03IAM & Workload Identity
- 04GKE & workload
- 05Data & secrets
- 06Perimeter & egress
- 07Report
- 08Re-test
Insights
GCP attack-path Resources.
Service-account chains, IAM condition gaps, and GCE/GKE pivots, write-ups from the reviewers who pentest Google Cloud estates.
Meet your engagement architect
One named lead from scope to close.
John Dill
vCISO at SecureLayer7
200+
engagements scoped
6
surfaces in one SOW
14 yr
SL7 offensive lineage
John scopes your GCP engagement, writes the SOW with named bug classes per surface, and stays on the line into the pod through execution.
Read the redactable sample report.
Pick a 30-minute slot. We will scope your engagement on the call.
Book a 30-min callTested by industry.
The bug classes named below come from real engagements in each sector. Pick the closest fit.
Built for Saudi Arabia engagements
What changes when we deliver here.
Compliance scoping
Tests from GCP me-central2 Dammam region
Regulatory framework
VPC Service Controls reviewed against NCA CCC
Local engagements
Khobar e-commerce closed 14 IAM bindings before SAMA review
Local pricing
SAR per-project GCP pricing with VAT 15%
Compliance scoping
Cloud Logging sinks anchored to KSA log buckets
GCP pentest questions from KSA cloud buyers.
Is testing run from me-central2 Dammam?
Yes. The engagement runs from the Dammam region. Organization Policy is set so artefacts never write outside KSA.
How are IAM and VPC-SC issues cited?
Bindings, custom roles, and VPC Service Controls are mapped to NCA CCC identity and network rows. Each finding names the resource ID.
Does the report match SAMA cloud guidance?
Yes. Cloud KMS, BigQuery encryption, and Logging sinks are written into SAMA cloud language for bank reviewers.
Where do Cloud Logging exports live?
In a KSA log bucket. Sink filters are reviewed during the engagement so no record leaves the Kingdom.
Delivery in Saudi Arabia
GCP testing inside me-central2 Dammam region.
IAM, VPC-SC, and Cloud Logging findings cite NCA CCC and SAMA cloud guidance. Projects tested in me-central2 with KSA-region log buckets.
- Direct line
- +966-11-000-0000
- Office
- Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Frameworks scoped: NCA ECC · SAMA CSF · PDPL · ISO/IEC 27001.
Sample GCP engagement report
See what arrives in your inbox.
A redactable PDF of a real GCP engagement: Workload Identity Federation chain, GKE node escape, Cloud Storage IAM leakage, with working PoC transcripts and CREST-mapped severity. Sent after a short scoping call.