Pentests for multi-tenant SaaS,the way your auditor will read them.

Multi-tenant isolation, webhook signing, SCIM provisioning, admin APIs, the surfaces your auditor flags and your customer-procurement teams test in their security review. Our engagements stage isolation drift, signing bypass, and admin-API IDOR as reproducible PoCs. Reports accepted by SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, and customer-procurement teams.

See the SaaS attack paths
Web application penetration testing, Scope, Test, Exploit, Report

Tenant boundaries, by hand

Cross-tenant IDOR across record IDs, slugs, integration tokens, search APIs, and billing meters.

Working proof-of-exploit

Captured SAML wrap, SCIM role-escalation transcripts, webhook replay traces. Not a checklist score.

Re-test included

Every finding re-tested after fixes ship. Written closure for SOC 2 + ISO 27001 evidence.

Three ways we test multi-tenant SaaS.

Tenant isolation, webhook signing, SCIM, admin APIs, customer-facing copilots. Pick the engagement that fits where your product is right now.

BugDazz Autonomous

Runs between SOC 2 cycles against tenant boundaries, OAuth scopes, SCIM flows, webhook HMAC and timestamp checks, and admin APIs. Re-tests every push.

Red team engagement

Adversary emulation against your production admin APIs and customer-tenant boundaries, with no warning to the on-call rotation. Output reads like an incident write-up.

AI and LLM pentest

Tests customer copilots and internal agents for prompt injection, cross-tenant data exfil via retrieval, function-call abuse, and system-prompt extraction.

Trusted by security teams across Fintech, SaaS & Education, Enterprise & Telecom, Security & Critical Infrastructure

Airbase
Quiltt
Pacvue
Imagine Learning

On record

  • CREST accredited
  • AICPA SOC 2 Type II
  • ISO/IEC 27001

Why a SOC 2 audit isn't a pentest

A control marked effective is not a tenant boundary held.

SOC 2 Type II tells your auditor that the control runs. It does not tell anyone whether a paying tenant can read another tenant's data through an admin-API parameter that nobody on your team has touched in six months. SecureLayer7's pentesters chain the surfaces the audit grades green: a webhook signature that fails open on a missing header, a SCIM provisioning race that grants workspace-admin to a deactivated user, an audit-log endpoint that accepts an injected event with the wrong tenant ID. Then we walk the proof your auditor will accept and your team will fix.

Scope

Every SaaS attack surface. Not just the OWASP top ten.

Six surfaces we exercise on every tech SaaS engagement. Multi-tenant isolation and identity sit at the top; data-export and supply-chain close the loop.

Multi-tenant isolation

Cross-tenant IDOR across record IDs, slug prediction, integration-token replay, search-API boundary leaks, billing-meter tampering.

OAuth, SSO, SCIM provisioning

SAML signature wrap, OAuth scope drift, SCIM admin-role escalation, JIT-provisioning race across Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Jumpcloud.

Admin API and internal tools

Retool-class admin exposure, super-admin scope creep, internal-API allowlist drift, support-impersonation paths to production data.

Webhook signing and replay

Webhook-secret leakage, signature wrap, replay-window abuse, integration-partner trust boundary, event-source spoofing.

Audit log and SOC 2 evidence

Log tampering, retention bypass, audit-event injection, after-the-fact rewrite, tenant-scoped log exfil.

Data export, rate-limit, supply chain

Bulk-export drift, GDPR subject-access boundary, per-tenant rate-limit bypass, free-tier escape, dependency confusion, secrets-in-history.

IN SCOPE.

Where we look across a tech SaaS stack.

TENANT
Isolation and IDOR

Record-level, workspace-level, organization-level boundaries probed across IDs, slugs, search APIs, and integration tokens.

IDENTITY
OAuth, SAML, SCIM

Scope drift, signature wrap, role-escalation, JIT race across every supported IDP.

INTEGRATIONS
Webhooks and admin APIs

Signing bypass, replay-window abuse, super-admin scope, internal-tool exposure.

EVIDENCE
Audit log and GDPR

Log integrity, retention, audit-event injection, subject-access boundary, bulk-export drift.

TECH SAAS ATTACK SURFACE.

What an attacker chains to cross tenant boundaries in a modern SaaS stack.

8
  1. 01
    Cross-tenant IDOR

    Record-ID, slug, or integration-token leak across workspaces, exfiltrating another tenant's customer data through the same product API.

  2. 02
    SAML signature wrap to admin takeover

    IDP response re-wrapped to swap the subject, granting workspace-admin or org-owner in a single sign-on flow.

  3. 03
    SCIM role-escalation to workspace admin

    SCIM patch on a deactivated user races provisioning, lands an attacker role inside the target tenant before deprovisioning settles.

  4. 04
    Webhook signing bypass to state poisoning

    Missing signature header treated as valid, replay-window left open, injected events flip billing, role, or integration state.

  5. 05
    Audit-log tampering to SOC 2 evidence gap

    Log retention bypass or audit-event injection rewrites the trail, breaking the evidence chain your auditor needs for CC controls.

  6. 06
    Admin-API exposure to super-admin access

    Internal-tool allowlist drift or support-impersonation endpoint reachable from outside, granting cross-tenant read or write.

  7. 07
    Dependency confusion to build-pipeline RCE

    Namespace squat or registry-priority flip lands attacker code inside CI, with secrets and signing keys reachable from the build runner.

MULTI-TENANT CHAIN CLASSES.

TECH SAAS METHODOLOGY.

Eight phases. Tenant-aware, evidence-ready.

Threat-modelled to your tenant graph, IDP topology, and integration partners. Not a template we run against every SaaS.

  1. 01
    Tenant model and boundary mapping
  2. 02
    OAuth, SCIM, SSO chain audit
  3. 03
    Admin-API surface enumeration
  4. 04
    Webhook signing and replay probe
  5. 05
    Audit-log integrity and retention review
  6. 06
    Data export and GDPR boundary
  7. 07
    Source code and dependency audit
  8. 08
    Chained finding, report, and free re-test

Meet our expert

One lead who knows multi-tenant SaaS.

John Dill

vCISO at SecureLayer7

10+

Years in offensive security

300+

Engagements led

99.7%

On-time delivery rate

John scopes tech SaaS engagements against your tenant model, IDP topology, and integration partners. He guides the pod from kick-off through final report and free re-test.

  • Scopes single-product and multi-product engagements against your real tenant model and IDP topology.
  • Owns kick-off, mid-engagement check-ins, and live walkthrough of every chained finding.
  • Drives remediation review and free re-test until every tenant-crossing path is closed.
SL7 Lab. Published CVE research.
John Dill, vCISO at SecureLayer7

Ready to scope a SaaS pentest? Book 30 minutes with John to walk through your tenant model, IDP topology, and timeline.

Book a 30-min call

Common procurement questions

What buyers ask about SaaS penetration testing.

Six questions procurement and security-review teams send before signing a SaaS pentest SOW. Answered against our methodology and your auditor.

Show all 6 questions

Have a procurement question not listed here?

Sample SaaS pentest engagement report cover

Sample engagement report

See what arrives in your inbox.

A pre-vetted sample SaaS pentest report: full tenant-crossing kill chain, working proof-of-exploit traces, SOC 2 CC and ISO 27001 Annex A mapping, and re-test scope. Sent on request after a 5-minute scoping call.