GDPR penetration testing

GDPR pentest Article 32 technical measures.

CREST-accredited researchers test the technical and organisational measures required under GDPR Article 32. Pseudonymisation, access controls, breach-resilience, data-subject-request infrastructure, and the report your DPO and supervisory authority accept.

GET YOUR SCOPING CALL

Talk to a security expert

Trusted by security teams across Fintech, SaaS & Education, Enterprise & Telecom, Security & Critical Infrastructure

Airbase
Quiltt
Pacvue
Imagine Learning

Why this matters

Most GDPR pentests miss what Article 32 actually requires.

  • Templated pentests list CVE numbers; Article 32 expects evidence of technical and organisational measures appropriate to the risk.

  • Data-subject-request infrastructure (export, erasure, portability) almost never gets pentested. Supervisory authorities are starting to ask.

  • Self-attested security measures do not survive a complaint-triggered Article 32 review by the supervisory authority.

Here is what we ship.

Why teams pick us

Article 32 evidence, not CVE lists.

  • Article 32 mapped

    Findings tagged to pseudonymisation, encryption-at-rest and in-transit, access control, breach resilience, and resilience testing.

  • DSR infrastructure tested

    Data-subject-request flows (Articles 15 through 22) tested for unauthorised access, IDOR, and cross-tenant leakage.

  • EU and UK GDPR coverage

    Findings shaped for both EU and UK GDPR supervisory authorities. Multi-jurisdiction SaaS supported.

How it works

From data map to report in two to three weeks.

  1. Scope to the data map

    Tell us personal-data categories, processing locations, DSR infrastructure, and supervisory-authority scope.

  2. Researchers test Article 32

    Technical and organisational measures tested for the risk classification you assert.

  3. Report your DPO accepts

    Findings tagged to Article 32, plus DSR-infrastructure evidence. Supervisory-authority defensible.

Research ledger,

Coordinated disclosures published by SL7 research.

The same researchers run your engagement.

Full advisories index

What founders say

“Thank you for being our pentest partners. Our user base is safer because of y'all.”
Vinay Hiremath

Vinay Hiremath

Co-founder, Loom

View tweet

Common questions

What buyers ask before they sign.

Does this satisfy Article 32?
It supports it. Independent pentest is the expected evidence for technical measures appropriate to the risk.
EU and UK GDPR coverage?
Yes. Both frameworks tested in one engagement; findings tagged to each supervisory authority's published guidance.
Will you test data-subject-request flows?
Yes. Article 15 through 22 infrastructure tested for unauthorised access and cross-tenant leakage.
Will the report help with breach notification?
Yes. Findings shaped to inform the 72-hour notification clock and the documented decisions trail.
Re-test included?
Yes. Criticals re-tested inside the same engagement.

Ready to make Article 32 defensible?

20-minute scoping call with the lead pentester. Pseudonymisation, access control, DSR infrastructure, and the supervisory-authority file.

CREST · CERT-In · SOC 2 · ISO 27001